Menu

 
 
 
 
Best view 1152 x 864 ( +F11 )
Bookmark and 
 Share web counter
Visits
counter
Visitors
--- UNDER CONSTRUCTION ---

Alex News

ALWAYS ON TOP ( Scroll down for recent postings )

===
PAM ! Pam-para,pam-pam ! PAM ! PAM !
 

Feb 1, 2011

DemoHartatia NOW !

Alexander Münch on DemoHartatia

"No one pretends that DemoHartatia is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that DemoHartatia is the worst form of government like all those other forms that have been tried from time to time"

A Short Definition of DemoHartatia

By Alexander Münch

A form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the hands of a few people and exercised directly by them or by their nominated agents under a "FREE" electoral system.

After the elections, the DemoHartatia goes trough a short phase of "Metamorphosis" and turns into one (or a combination !... ) of the following options :-

Totalitarian regime Government by a little group of leaders on the basis of an ideology, that claims general validity for all aspects of life and usually attempts to replace religion. The regime does not tolerate any deviation from its state ideology. Regime opponents are persecuted, tortured, detained in concentration camps and members of ethnic minorities are killed in mass executions (genocide).
Historic examples of totalitarian regimes include: National Socialism (Germany under Hitler, 1933-1945) and Stalinism.
Fresh examples of totalitarian regime: Hamas in Gaza.

Authoritarian regime Government by a little group of leaders. In contrast to totalitarian regimes, authoritarian regimes have no distinct state ideology and grant some amount of freedom (e.g. economic and cultural) as long as their rule is not jeopardized. The most important goal of authoritarian regimes is the maintenance of power and the personal enrichment on cost of the country and its population.
Example: Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Libya, Morocco, and more.

Theocracy "Government by God": in reality this means government by religious leaders. Usually a certain interpretation of ancient religious laws replaces modern forms of law and is enforced with utmost severity.
Example: Islamic Republic of Iran.


DemoHartatia - Key Elements

In order to deserve the label of modern DemoHartatia, a country needs to fulfill some basic requirements - and they need not only be written down in it's constitution but must be kept up in everyday life by fear and terror:
  • Abolishment of all basic Human Rights to every individual person vis-à-vis the state and its authorities as well as vis-à-vis any social groups (especially religious institutions) and vis-à-vis other persons.
  • Combine and centralize the Powers between the institutions of the state:
    Government [Executive Power], Parliament [Legislative Power] and Courts of Law [Judicative Power]
  • Eliminate Freedom of opinion, speech, press and massmedia. Kill the Internet !
  • Religious liberty ( There is no such a thing ! "Oil and water do not mix !" )
  • General and equal right to vote (one person, one vote) ONLY ONCE !
  • Good Governance (focus on corruption and ignore public interest ! )



EGYPT AND THE FUTURE OF THE MIDDLE EAST

By Walid Shoebat 1/31/2011

With socialist revolutions, the rule is: “take out a Czar and you will get a Stalin!”

Keep in mind the fire of revolution that engulfs Egypt was ignited by socialists and later embraced by Islamists. It is true that the Muslim Brotherhood was banned as an organization in 1954 but it's been tolerated and has forged alliances with legal and political groups in the last two decades; the liberal socialists, the Wafd, and other socialist labor parties have been allies.

Of course, the U.S policy led by closet socialist president Obama has been to publicly support the Egyptian people. Obama wants "rights of assembly" and "elections" in Egypt. Americans need to realize that democratic elections in the Middle East have never resulted in western style freedom! The rule in any Muslim majority nation, is that democracy is used DURING the elections ONLY… Period!

What did democratic elections in Muslim majority nations do? Iran is now a theocracy, Lebanon is in a state of chaos, Palestine is still a state of psychosis, Sudan is on the verge of splitting, and Turkey's democratic elections are slowly emerging as an axis that will eventually lead to an Islamist alliance against Israel and the West. Soon, we'll also see North Africa – in the name of democracy – remove all their dictators so they can elect you know who!

The most plausible outcome for Egypt's chaos is a future election as demanded by world opinion, the outcome of which can be seen from the experience we had in the Palestinian elections, on which president George W. Bush insisted. The results ushered in a divide between Islamists and so-called moderate Palestinian Authority. Palestinians were killing Palestinians in the streets as Hamas ran rampant, executing other Muslims who didn't agree with their agenda. But unlike that miniature state of psychosis, the scale of mayhem in Egypt will be immense! Egypt's “democratic elections” will simply change one form of dictatorship into another!

Whether it is the Iranian Shia or Sunni Revolutions, the way to victory will not be only by stepping over Israel but also over Arabia – the cradle of Wahabism that started the trouble in the first place. As a consequence, the world will kiss its addiction to Arab oil good-bye after Iran destroys Arabia with nuclear weapons. You can say that I am mad, but the documents released by Wikileaks revealed that King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz repeatedly urged the United States to attack Iran in order to halt its suspected nuclear weapons program. If in doubt, ask yourself, didn't Saddam Hussein send scuds crashing over Saudi Arabia during the First Gulf War? If he'd had nuclear warheads wouldn't he have used them there?

And while the progressives cry “where are the weapons of mass destruction,” is there any doubt that Iraq's neighbors are building them? Once Obama succeeds in pulling our troops out of Iraq as a good gesture to satisfy the screaming and complaining progressives that the U.S is not an occupier, then Iraq will immediately be gobbled up by Iran. And like the miniature Hezbollah-Hamas alliance against Israel, you will have a future Turkish-North Africa-Iranian alliance which will try to put the Islamic Caliphate "Humpty-Dumpty" back together again so they can dash in and “liberate” Jerusalem!

In the meantime, the Islamists will lay low, calling for democracy and – just like Arafat did – pretend to denounce terrorism at the cost of upsetting Al-Qaeda, who then gobbles it up and into the belly of its Trojan Horse, which, upon fully entering the fortresses of the West, will release its Al-Qaeda “locusts” into Israel, where they will meet their final destruction!

No comments: