Menu

 
 
 
 
Best view 1152 x 864 ( +F11 )
Bookmark and 
 Share web counter
Visits
counter
Visitors
--- UNDER CONSTRUCTION ---

Alex News

ALWAYS ON TOP ( Scroll down for recent postings )

===
PAM ! Pam-para,pam-pam ! PAM ! PAM !
 

Nov 24, 2009

Another Turkish trick ! ISRAEL YOK !...

Malignant Turks refuse to play Israeli national anthem for Israeli chess tournament winner, who stands defiant

Marcel.jpg Defiant and victorious (JW)



The following letter was sent to FIDE, President Kirsan Ilumzhinov and Vice President Israel Gelfer.

Dear Mr. President,

I write to you with great concern following what seems as a serious incident that occurred .Today during the closing ceremony of the world junior championships held in Turkey. Happily our girl junior player, Marcel Efroymsky, has won the world title and the gold medal. As customed in such events, the delegations prepared to stand and salute the national anthem of the winner's country. Astonishingly and without any warning, the organizers decided to cancel the playing of the winners anthem. The Turkish organization has offered a ridiculous explanation that they do not have the time to spend on such event.

This excuse is absurd in light of the same venue hosting this event two years ago where all winner anthems were played! In there actions, the organizers demonstrated disrespect to the junior winners, their federation and their countries. As chairman of the Israeli Chess Federation, I herby urge you to investigate this incident. I must say that this kind of boycott (if such occurred) strikes as a another example of how politics interferes with chess. I call you as president of the FIDE, for which the tournament carried your flag, to investigate this issue and if the information appeared to be accurate, then to denounce this disrespectful conduct if the information.

My feeling is, that such events hurt chess in general and send the wrong message the children who dream to become chess champions taking pride in representing their countries.

Yours truly,

Aviv Bushinsky
Chairman of the Israeli Chess Federation



Bookmark and Share

Nov 23, 2009

AOW, is this photo real?...

I just opened the " Jordan Cabernet Sauvignon 1989 " !


Bookmark and Share

Nov 22, 2009

Atheists ruining Britain?


guardian.co.uk home

Where are all these militant atheists ruining Britain?

In a desperate attempt to secure its electoral base, the government is shamefully wooing religious extremists

As every middlebrow with a newspaper column or Radio 4 slot to fill agrees, a vulgar "new atheism" is sweeping Britain. The readers of Richard Dawkins, Philip Pullman and Christopher Hitchens are, they tell us, crass because they do not appreciate the mystery of religion, the consolations of ritual and all the rest of it, and also dangerous because they are as fundamentalist in their criticisms of religion as the religious fanatics they criticise.

I could waste your time by pointing out that "new atheists" are not so different from old atheists – we still don't believe in God, for instance – and add that the charge of moral equivalence would be easier to substantiate if atheists planted bombs on the underground. But space is short and the depressing truth about "new atheists" no one dwells on is that if they exist outside the imaginations of religious writers, they are never there when you need them. For if we had a vibrant atheist or secularist movement in Britain, it would now be tearing into this government for once again trying to ride the Islamist tiger.

Last Sunday, John Denham, the communities secretary, announced: "Anyone wanting to build a more progressive society would ignore the powerful role of faith at their peril. We should continually seek ways of encouraging and enhancing the contribution faith communities make on the central issues of our time."

As the week wore on, it became clear what type of "faith communities" Labour wanted to put at the centre of its "progressive society". Denham is forcing out of his department Azhar Ali, an adviser from the heart of the Labour movement (he was once the Labour leader of Pendle council). Ali's crime was that he opposed Islamism while advising Tony Blair, Ruth Kelly and Hazel Blears.

After Daud Abdullah, the deputy general secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain, signed a declaration advocating attacks on the Royal Navy if Gordon Brown sent ships to impose an arms blockade on Gaza, Ali told his comrades to cut all links. He might have said that a centre-left party should never have had links with the MCB in the first place. It contains supporters of the Arab Muslim Brotherhood and the south Asian Jamaat-e-Islami. Arab liberals know the Brotherhood to be the enemy of every enlightened value they hold, while their Bangladeshi equivalents regard Jamaat in the same way Observer readers regard the BNP, only worse because Jamaat murderers collaborated in the Pakistani army's crimes during the Bangladeshi war of independence.

That brief moment of principled politics is over. There's talk of the government giving the MCB's Sir Iqbal "death perhaps is a bit too easy for Salman Rushdie" Sacranie a peerage. Meanwhile, ministers are about to cut financial support for Sufi Muslims who, like the majority of Britain's Muslims, Sunni or Shia, are not represented by the MCB.

The fix is in and Islamists are all over Whitehall again. Denham is entertaining Inayat Bunglawala of the MCB, who gave a taste of the "progressive" policies Labour is encouraging when he wrote an article defending Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, and a preacher who recommends wife-beating, genital mutilation of girls and the murder of apostates and homosexuals. Earlier this year, the sheikh said of Adolf Hitler's massacre's of the Jews: "This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers."

Astute outsiders look at people who were on the 20th-century left and notice that they have gone from calling themselves "socialists" to "social democrats" to "third wayers" to "progressives" in rapid succession. They might have wondered what the new "progressive" label means. Now they know.

Over at the Department for Children, Schools and Families, Ed Balls is as keen on appeasing the churches as Denham is on appeasing radical Islam. Last week, the National Secular Society (of which I am a patron) described how Labour allowed faith schools to reject applications from non-religious teachers solely on the grounds that they doubted the presence of supernatural beings or worshipped the wrong supernatural being. The rebuttal Balls's department issued was so vituperative and inaccurate that civil servants had to take the virtually unheard-of step of withdrawing it and thus tacitly acknowledge the truth of the secularists' claim that the only people New Labour allowed employers to discriminate against were atheists and sceptics.

You don't need to be a political tactician to understand Labour's dog-whistle politics. Balls is playing both sides by alleging that the Tories would bring creationism to the classroom while doing nothing to restrict religious control of schools. At the Department for Communities, I am told that real power does not rest with the ineffective John Denham, but Shahid Malik, his deputy, who perhaps hopes that appeasing Jamaat and the Brotherhood will help him keep the core vote in his Dewsbury seat and enable a few other desperate Labour MPs to survive a potential Tory landslide as well.

No minister, though, imagines that they will pay a political price as hundreds of thousands of "new atheists" walk away in disgust. Which is not to say that a price will not be paid, just that it will come in a coinage no Observer reader should want to accept. Communalist politics do not always generate a liberal backlash; more often, communalism merely produces heightened communal tension.

Sufis are now promising to tell Dewsbury Muslims not to vote for Malik, which is no more than he deserves. More seriously, a revival of the left's affair with Islamism can only help the BNP by convincing the white working class that their rulers hypocritically denounce racial conspiracy theories, misogyny and homophobia when they come from the followers of Nick Griffin, but not when they come from the friends of Yusuf al-Qaradawi.

It is a dismal way to imagine Britain's longest period of left-wing rule ending, but perhaps it will take the BNP winning a parliamentary contest or so splitting the Labour vote that the Tories come through the middle in "safe" seats for the party to realise you cannot be a fairweather anti-fascist or part-time leftist without your "progressive society" turning to dust.



Bookmark and Share

THE CANARY IS ALREADY DEAD !

CAIRO — Hundreds of Muslim protesters on Saturday burnt Christian-owned shops in southern Egypt and attacked a police station where they believed a Christian accused of raping a Muslim girl was being held, a police official said.

Police repelled the demonstrators in the town of Farshut using tear gas and also arrested 60 people during the clashes in which seven Coptic Christian-owned shops were destroyed, the official said.

The protesters hurled stones at the police station after they heard that a Coptic Christian man accused of kidnapping and sexually assaulting a 12-year-old Muslim was being held there, he said.

Roughly ten percent of Egypt's 80-million-strong population are Coptic Christians, who complain of discrimination and are sometimes the target of sectarian attacks.


My comment on JW.

=== " Egypt:- Muslims burn Christian shops " ===

Why ?

Because no Jewish shops could be found around !

" THE CANARY IS ALREADY DEAD ! NOW IT IS THE TURN OF THE MINERS " !!


Bookmark and Share

Nov 21, 2009

ONE ISRAELI SOLDIER = U$ 1,400,000 !... ( I'm rich! )

Hamas :- 1.4 million U$ for IDF soldier

by Infidelesto on November 18, 2009

Putting international aid to good use! And the left whines about “living conditions” in Gaza…

Gilad Shalit was captured by Palestinian militants in June 2006
Gilad Shalit was captured by Palestinian militants in June 2006

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — A Gaza charity headed by the interior minister of the militant Hamas group on Wednesday offered $1.4 million to any Arab citizen of Israel who abducts a soldier.

Palestinians have frequently called on Israeli Arabs to abduct Israeli soldiers, but this is the first time that money has been offered.

The Waad group from Gaza offered the bounty for Israeli soldiers in an e-mail sent to Palestinian media. The organization, which supports Palestinian prisoners held by Israel, is headed by Hamas’ Interior Minister Fathi Hamad. The minister did not return messages seeking comment.

The charity could presumably raise the cash through its connections with Hamas. The militant group is thought to have millions of dollars at its disposal, both through its tight control of Gaza and support from Iran and other allies.

Waad’s director, Usama Kahlout, said the bounty was in response to an Israeli group’s offer to pay Gaza residents for information on the whereabouts of Sgt. Gilad Schalit, an Israeli soldier captured more than three years ago by Hamas-allied militants.


Bookmark and Share

My new Twetter folower !...

These are intended as guidelines for intelligent people rather than as comprehensive programming for industrial robots.
Conduct on this forum should be approached in the same manner as conduct in any other social situation.
Use your common sense and make allowances for your fellow human beings.

This forum is run by humans for humans. What this means is that in practice things will never be perfect.
Somebody has to run the place and this responsibility falls on the staff. Their decisions are to be regarded as binding.

This does not mean that no questioning will ever be allowed, but it should be done via the "Questions, Problems & Suggestions" sub-forum rather than being taken all over the forum in general. The staff will consider any reasonably presented request for reconsideration of a decision, but once the decision has been reconsidered and a ruling given no further discussion will be entered into. Continuing to spam a topic after the staff have given a considered ruling will be taken as being trolling and therefore subject to official warnings.

As none of the staff have balls made of crystal we reserve the right to alter these rules or add to them as necessary.

1/ Discussion of Islamic beliefs.

This is allowed, and indeed encouraged, subject to certain restrictions.

If you are going to state that something is Islamic you must be prepared to back your statements by quoting authorities and/or texts.
If you cannot back your statements with a reputable source and your statements are deemed inflammatory you may be given a "smite".

In other words, make sure you know what you are talking about and how to phrase it in the most reasonable fashion.

2/ Personal attacks (including insults).

These are frowned upon, and the use of them may result in a warning from the staff.
We realise that some of the issues discussed here are emotive for some people and
we don't expect everyone to be perfect angels all the time, but we do expect you to make an effort.
If the warning is ignored and more personal attacks follow, the person making them will be given a "smite".
It is fine to attack a person's ideas but not the person themselves.
Using people's life experiences as a weapon to beat them up is particularly frowned on.
We cordially suggest that you refrain from trying this little trick.

If you get involved in a flame war with another member or members the staff will not be interested in "who started it".
If you want the staff to be sympathetic to your position please try to refrain from responding to abuse with more abuse.
Another thing to note is that this forum has an "Ignore" feature. If you don't like someone's posts there is no need for you to read them.
There is also no need for you to make a point of telling everyone who you are ignoring. They can see for themselves.

3/ Calls for genocide, or for the deaths of innocents.

Once again, not acceptable. No warnings will be given for this offense. A smite will be issued immediately.
This includes, but is not limited to, death threats to other members and promoting things like "honour killings".

4/ Rape victims.

Under no circumstances will suggesting that rape victims are responsible for the actions of a rapist be tolerated.
Once again, it is grounds for an instant smite. No advance warnings will be given.

5/ Trolling and other inflammatory behaviour.

This can be hard to strictly define in words, but most people claim to be able to recognise it.
If a staff member asks you to stop trolling, goading or whatever then please take their advice.
It is ultimately up to the staff to decide what is and is not acceptable behaviour on this forum.
If in doubt err on the side of reasonableness and politeness. It won't cause the end of the world.
Also note that opening multiple accounts is considered trolling. No appeals will be entertained.

6/ Disclosure of personal information.

We recommend that you carefully consider what you will and will not disclose about yourself on this or any other public forum.
Bear in mind that you will basically be broadcasting it to the entire world.
Respect other posters' privacy. Do not post personal information of other posters or speculation about such information on this forum unless they have already volunteered such information on this forum and have not retracted it since. Such information may include their real name, address, private and business email and employer.
This list is not definitive. Posting other personal information could also be considered a violation of someone's privacy.

7/ Signatures and avatars.

Generally we're pretty tolerant but occasionally we may remove a sig or avatar, either because it is unnecessarily offensive or because it links to a site we do not want advertised on this forum. We will also remove any large images in sigs. Anything up to 468x60 is acceptable, depending on the content. This is a standard internet banner size. If you post a sig image larger than this it will be removed. Also note that only static images are allowed as some people find repeating animations annoying.
The person affected will be notified by PM.
Such actions by the staff are not subject to appeal and a smite will be issued if the offending content is re-posted.

8/ Smites and banning.

If you receive three smites you will be rewarded with a ban. Generally members will be given warnings before being given smites, but there may be times when the behaviour is regarded as so extreme that a smite will be issued without warning. This also applies to banning.

Bans may be temporary or permanent. These decisions will be made at the discretion of the staff.

9/ PM's and Privacy.

Private Messages are not to be posted on the open forum without the permission of the sender, this includes PM's from mods and admins. Posting a PM will result in at least a warning. The mods and admins can not read your PM's

10/ Edit/Deletes.

Mass editing/deleting of posts is not allowed. If you choose to leave the forum your posts will stay behind. Exceptions can be made for personal blog threads.

The forum administrators can be contacted by emailing admins@councilofexmuslims.com

We recommend that you do not use a hotmail account for your reply address as they seem to have a habit of losing our emails.
One of the other free email providers would be a better option. We suspect the lost emails are due to the configuration of hotmail's spam filters.
It is likely that they are set to block unsolicited email from web sites.
If you do wish to use a hotmail account please ensure that this site is listed as one you wish to receive email from.



Bookmark and Share

The alarm clock is R I N G I N G !

Walid Shoebat 3

Jewish Betrayal of Arabs who speak for Israel with better grammar and spelling


Sorry: I did not check the original article properly before sending, here is a better version which I am sure is not perfect for the perfectionists. Please post and send to yoru blogs and friends

Dear Mr. Firestone:

It is with sadness and anger that I write this letter to complain about Tigers for Israel and Rabbi Julie Roth who are part of the Hillel organization at Princeton University. These people capitulated under pressure from the Muslim Student Association and dis-invited Nonie Darwish from Arabs for Israel to speak on the campus. These court Jews did not want to offend the Muslim terror sympathizers or the Arab money sucking Princeton University administration. These are the same type of Jews on the same campus of Princeton that were literally terrorized by the same pressure groups that canceled our event, "the Three Ex Terrorists" in Dec 2005. Our own event was well planned and professionally orchestrated with a team of ten people with a cost of $28,000 which was nearly wasted by some spoilt cowardly Jewish students. Only the ingenuity of our own efforts we managed to get the message out to nearly 40 million people through media exposure.

We have courageous Palestinians willing to die for the cause of Israel and Jews who fear Goliath? Our organization has suffered the same treatment at the hands of many in the Jewish community and yet again Nonie Darwish who runs an organization called "Arabs for Israel" whose father was a hater and killer of Jews was killed by Israel yet she now speaks out for her former enemy; is invited by both Princeton and Columbia by so called pro Israel groups and then dis-invited her because of "pressure by Muslim groups." The excuse given that "they did not vet her thoroughly" Vet her for what? That she was too pro Israel and spoke the truth about terrorism in Israel from her own experiences as a former Muslim, go figure! Are the leaders of Tigers (Pussies) for Israel not aware of the 850,000 Jews thrown out of Arab lands between 1948 and 1973 through ethnic cleansing by Arabs.

Hillel who also condemned us for "hate speech" that former terrorists that made their main mission to stand up for Israel. To Hillel exposing Jew hatred is classified as “hate speech”? Are the millions given to Hillel intended to instill ‘Jewishness’ to students through eating bagels and lox on Sunday? Chabad Rabbis can do a much better job instead.

The lack of pride, knowledge and cowardice from Jewish students is a sad reflection on their parents who have not brought their kids up with a sense of pride in who and what a Jew stands for.

The lack of knowledge of the history of Israel is breath taking. One example is when I received a call from a Jewish student in Yale law school in his second year, in one of the best schools in the country, who headed the Pro Israel organization on campus wishing to advocate for Israel. He was prompted to invite Walid Shoebat to speak at the University. He wished to ask me more about Walid's political views being against giving land for peace before inviting to speak. I asked him could I ask him a couple of questions first, and he agreed. I asked "Are you very familiar and have you studied the modern history of Israel?" in which he replied "no, I am not very familiar and have not studied the modern history of Israel." Then I asked him "how he was able to determine his political views concerning Israel, was it from the New York Times, CBS, NBC or CNN?" he responded "yes that is how I formulate my opinion." I then curtly responded, "young man you are not qualified to ask me a
question!" It was pointless pursuing an avenue with such an uninformed student. How tragic and how sad.

The problem with advocating for Israel on our campuses is two fold: a lack of courage/knowledge and a lack of a professional approach. Jewish students are for the most scared, uneducated on Israel issues and lack pride in their heritage. The leaders and parents are the same and should hang their heads in shame that they are not willing to take up the battle for their brothers in Israel with knowledge and courage and provide the money, tools and expertise to fight the cause properly. Instead we see betrayal after betrayal of the very people who risk their own lives for what it seems to them a very unworthy and treacherous people. Imagine how Nonie Darwish, Walid Shoebat, Brigitte Gabriel and others feel from this disgraceful show from spoilt, cowardly and ignorant wimps that call themselves "pro Israel advocates".

Through our history many Jews have acted in betraying their G-d and their own people. The story of the Golden Calf, the Twelve Spies, the persecution of our prophets, the lack of faith in our rights as Jews and so on. If we think rationally why we have survived as a people based on our own collective behavior as a nation, we should not have survived at all. The only conclusion I can come as a Jew is that we have survived because of G-d himself and his mercy and compassion.

Yet again some Jews have decided appeasing the enemy is more worthy than standing with their allies and friends. Now we fight on for the people and the land of Israel despite the pathetic weakness of many American Jews.

Keith Davies

Executive Director Walid Shoebat Foundation

................................................................
This email should only be sent to those who have asked to receive it.
To unsubscribe, return to the web form where you first subscribed and
click the "unsubscribe" button, or contact the owner of the website.



Bookmark and Share

AMNON :- Watch & Learn !...

Nov 20, 2009

I know who you are !...

Visit Detail
Visit 5,507



Domain Name
verizon.net ? (Network)
IP Address
141.156.194.252 ? (Verizon Internet Services)
ISP
Verizon Internet Services
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States (Facts)
State : District of Columbia
City : Washington
Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
Language
English (U.S.)
en-us
Operating System
Microsoft WinXP
Browser
Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.0.3) Gecko/2008092417 Firefox/3.0.3
Javascript
version 1.5
Monitor
Resolution : 1280 x 800
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit
Nov 19 2009 3:38:12 pm
Last Page View
Nov 19 2009 3:40:00 pm
Visit Length
1 minute 48 seconds
Page Views
3
Referring URL

Visit Entry Page
http://alexander-mun...1/i-told-you-so.html
Visit Exit Page
http://alexander-mun...1/hard-evidence.html
Out Click

Time Zone
UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time
Nov 19 2009 8:38:12 am
Visit Number
5,507





Visitor Path Duration (s)
(1) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/2009/11/i-told-you-so.html 84
(2) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/ 24
(3) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/2009/11/hard-evidence.html 0


Visit Detail
Visit 5,502



Domain Name
blueyonder.co.uk ? (U.K.)
IP Address
82.44.73.63 ? (Genesis Business Park)
ISP
Telewest Broadband
Location
Continent : Europe
Country : United Kingdom (Facts)
State/Region : Surrey
City : Surbiton
Lat/Long : 51.3833, -0.3 (Map)
Language
English (U.K.)
en-gb
Operating System
Microsoft WinNT
Browser
Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; Tablet PC 2.0; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30618)
Javascript
version 1.3
Monitor
Resolution : 1152 x 864
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit
Nov 19 2009 12:22:36 pm
Last Page View
Nov 19 2009 12:29:15 pm
Visit Length
6 minutes 39 seconds
Page Views
7
Referring URL
http://www.ummat-al-...g/honours/index.html
Visit Entry Page
http://alexander-mun.../10/kafir-proud.html
Visit Exit Page
http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/
Out Click
visit... www.al-Rassooli.com to learn more...
http://www.al-rassooli.com/
Time Zone
UTC+0:00
Visitor's Time
Nov 19 2009 10:22:36 am
Visit Number
5,502





Visitor Path Duration (s)
Referral http://www.ummat-al-kuffar.org/honours/index.html 0
(1) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/2009/10/kafir-proud.html 16
(2) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/ 124
Out Click http://www.ummat-al-kuffar.org/images/global_ummat-al-kuffar_Ual
http://www.ummat-al-kuffar.org/
0
(3) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/2009/10/kafir-proud.html 33
Out Click http://a0.twimg.com/a/1258570280/images/twitter_logo_header.png
http://twitter.com/abuamnon
0
(4) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/2009/10/kafir-proud.html 76
(5) http://alexander-munch.blogspot....153-153255204-255202122-top.html 69
Out Click visit... www.al-Rassooli.com to learn more...
http://www.al-rassooli.com/
0
(6) http://alexander-munch.blogspot....153-153255204-255202122-top.html 81
(7) http://alexander-munch.blogspot.com/ 0




Bookmark and Share

Nov 19, 2009

Talking to myself.....

Dear Ice Star,

I tried to read your stuff 3 times and I hit the keyboard with my head 4 times!...

You see, this area was not designed as an substitute to the Haifa University Faculty of Islam, first year semester 1 !

This billboard was designed as a 'Killing zone' for us "THE GANG" to discharge our anger,fury,frustration and the whole lot, on the M/Fs on top!

Mr. Spencer, We are hungry!

HYENAS!...


Just my way of venting on each point. I try to be coherent in contrast to the ignorance of the pipe smoking hate mailer.


Dear Ice Star,

Thanks for your speedy reply!

We shall meet again!

I don't know when, but I do know where...

Keep on the good work.

Regards,

Alex.


This billboard was designed as a 'Killing zone' for us "THE GANG" to discharge our anger,fury,frustration and the whole lot, on the M/Fs on top! http://ow.ly/u5J0 nice idea!!




Bookmark and Share

Nov 17, 2009

Hard Evidence

Hard Evidence Seven salient facts about Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan.

Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan.

The admonition not to rush to judgment or jump to conclusions might sound fair and prudent enough, perhaps even statesmanlike when uttered by the president, as long it's borne in mind that such advice is itself a judgment that is more than halfway to a conclusion. What it plainly implies in the present case is that the actions of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan should not be assumed in any meaningful way to be related to his Muslim faith.

Perfect subjective knowledge of the major's possibly disordered mind is not available to me, but nor is it available to the host of damage-control commentators and FBI drones who have had things mostly their own way so far. In order to demonstrate the absence of a connection, however, the following facts would have to be regarded as relatively random or secondary:

1) Hasan had been in direct correspondence with a notorious preacher of violence, Anwar al-Awlaki, whose enthusiasm for the teachings and actions of al-Qaida has long been well-known to researchers and intelligence agencies.

2) He bought weapons for himself well in advance of a murderous assault on unarmed soldiers awaiting treatment at a clinic—people to whom, in addition to his responsibilities as a human being, he also owed, as a physician, a sworn duty of care.

3) As he unleashed his volleys, he yelled the universal cry of jihad, "Allahu akbar!" or "God is great!" (The eyewitnesses on this point, originally doubted, are especially convincing since some of them didn't understand the meaning of the words and only sought to reproduce them phonetically.) On his business card, he described himself described as "SOA" or "slave," or possibly, "soldier of Allah." Neither would be especially reassuring in this context.

4) He had attracted considerable attention by repeatedly using his postgraduate classes at the Uniformed Service University in Bethesda, Md., for the purpose of Islamic proselytizing, for a version of Islam that, to say the least, did not overemphasize it as a "religion of peace."

5) He had, in spoken and written communications, demonstrated a fascination with the love of death and the concept of suicide martyrdom (better described as suicide murder) that is the central concept of Bin Ladenism.

6) Though he may have been upset by the harrowing stories of returned soldiers—as many, many of us have been, incidentally—his overwhelming and reiterated objection to the war against the Taliban in Afghanistan, and al-Qaida in Iraq, is that it is "a war on Islam." It might be worth noting that this means that the Taliban does represent Islam, whereas the current governments of Iraq and Afghanistan somehow do not—a core belief of the Islamic purists who use the dogma of takfir to excommunicate such Muslims and render them liable, along with many other kind of infidel, to holy slaughter.

7) He seems to have been especially obsessed with the Quranic injunction that forbids devout Muslims to make alliances with Christians and Jews.

The above list is not exhaustive, but I would submit that five of the seven items (the first and the last four) would have been grounds to have had him either put under close surveillance or dismissed from the service. Proselytizing in uniform, for example, is already banned by a general order. To be "inclusive," the United States armed forces must exclude or discipline those who oppose inclusion. This, of course, goes for zealots of all faiths, and it won't do to point out that it isn't always universally applied. The Hasan atrocity makes such an application more urgent, not less.

What about the emphasis on Hasan's supposedly knife-edge mental state? Well, even supposing it to have been precarious, it can hardly have been improved by immersion in the rantings of Anwar al-Awlaki. I do not say that all practitioners of woman-hating, anti-Semitic, sadomasochistic suicide immolations are themselves insane, but I do say that the teaching itself is demented. In the same way, I do not say that all Muslims are terrorists, but I have noticed that an alarmingly high proportion of terrorists are Muslim. A paranoid or depressive person—of whom we have many millions in our midst—does not have to end up screaming religious slogans while butchering his fellow creatures. But a paranoid or depressive person who is in regular touch with a jihadist "spiritual leader" is presented with a ready-made script that offers him paradise in exchange for homicide.

All right, then, wasn't the gallant major also subject to ill treatment and even abuse? Only up to a point, when you consider that his parents had been given refuge from Palestine and enabled to build a life here, that he himself had knowingly joined an all-volunteer army, that he had been promoted (it seems rather faster and higher than his true abilities warranted) and allowed on the job to vent extremely noxious opinions about members of other faiths, to say nothing about his adopted country. No doubt he came in for a taunt or two, but if you want to avoid that, then don't express contempt for your fellow soldiers while in uniform. Black Americans used to be segregated. Jewish recruits were mercilessly hazed, as were men or women who looked as if they might be gay. Did any of them ever come up with an act of mass murder as a response? Did any of them ever offer a black or Jewish or gay ideology in justification of it? Would they have earned sympathy and understanding if they had? By the time the mushy "pre-post-traumatic" school was done with the story, Maj. Hasan was not just acquitted of being a bad Muslim. He was more or less exonerated of having even done a bad deed.

This is not at all a matter of the usual stupid refusal of the FBI and other security services to understand an early warning even when they have detected one. It is a direct challenge to the unity and integrity of the armed services, which have been one of our society's principal organs and engines of ethnic and religious integration. A U.S. soldier who wonders about the reliability of his, let alone her, Muslim colleague is not being "Islamophobic." (A phobia is an irrational or uncontrollable fear.) If Maj. Hasan has made this understandable worry in the ranks more widespread, he has done his fanatical preacher friend the greatest possible service. But that's his fault for doing what he did, and his superiors' fault for letting him openly rehearse it for so long, not mine for pointing it out.

I wrote some years ago that the three most salient characteristics of the Muslim death-squad type were self-righteousness, self-pity, and self-hatred. Surrounded as he was by fellow shrinks who were often very distressed by his menacing manner, Maj. Hasan managed to personify all three traits—with the theocratic rhetoric openly thrown in for good measure—and yet be treated even now as if the real word for him was troubled. Prepare to keep on meeting those three symptoms again, along with official attempts to oppose them only with therapy, if that. At least the holy warriors know they are committing suicide.



Bookmark and Share

U.S. Soldiers - ‘ War Crimes ’ ( Goldston, you have a new job !...)

Hasan Wanted His Patients Prosecuted

From ABC News:

Officials: Major Hasan Sought ‘War Crimes’ Prosecution of U.S. Soldiers

Rebuffed, Accused Fort Hood Shooter Took Extra Target Practice, Closed Bank Safety Deposit Box in Final Days, Investigators Say

By JOSEPH RHEE, MARY-ROSE ABRAHAM, ANNA SCHECTER, and BRIAN ROSS

Nov. 16, 2009 — Major Nidal Malik Hasan’s military superiors repeatedly ignored or rebuffed his efforts to open criminal prosecutions of soldiers he claimed had confessed to "war crimes" during psychiatric counseling, according to investigative reports circulated among federal law enforcement officials.

On Nov. 4, the day after his last attempt to raise the issue, he took extra target practice at Stan’s shooting range in nearby Florence, Texas and then closed a safe deposit box he had at a Bank of America branch in Killeen, according to the reports. A bank employee told investigators Hasan appeared nervous and said, "You’ll never see me again."

Diane Wagner, Bank of America’s senior vice president of media relations, said that her company does not "comment or discuss customer relationships" but is "cooperating fully with law enforcement officials."

Investigators believe Hasan’s frustration over the failure of the Army to pursue what he regarded as criminal acts by U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan may have helped to trigger the shootings.

"The Army may not want to admit it, and you may not hear much about it, but it was very big for him," said one of the federal investigators on the task force collecting evidence of the crime.

His last effort to get the attention of military investigators came on Nov. 2, three days before his alleged shooting spree, according to the reports.

Colonel Anthony Febbo at Fort Hood reportedly told investigators he was twice contacted by Hasan, on Nov. 2 and a week earlier in October, about the question of whether he could legally provide information on "war crimes" he had learned in the course of psychiatric counseling he provided soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan….

His supervisor in the Department of Psychiatry, Captain Naomi Surman, told investigators that Hasan raised similar issues with her in conversations in October, according to documents reviewed by ABC News.

Captain Surman told investigators that Hasan had formally contacted military prosecutors to report patients he was evaluating, according to people briefed on the exchange. She said Hasan signed his e-mails with "Praise Be to Allah." …

Captain Surman, who was scheduled to be deployed to Afghanistan with Hasan on Nov. 2 told investigators that Hasan had both social and academic issues in his medical training. She said that on one occasion, Hasan told her she was an infidel who would be "ripped to shreds" and "burn in hell" because she was not Muslim…

Employees at the shooting range where Hasan practiced just two days before the massacre told investigators that Hasan purchased ten separate targets and fired more than 200 rounds with his newly purchased semi-automatic pistol.

After buying the gun in August from a Killeen store called Guns Galore, Hasan later returned to purchase 13 separate ammunition magazines capable of holding up to 30 bullets each.

Store employees told investigators that they became suspicious of Hasan’s purchase of so many extra ammunition magazines. The employees said Hasan claimed he needed the extra magazines so he would not have to reload when he fired at the practice range.

Somehow most of the news coverage has failed to note what a terrible doctor Hasan must have been. Our soldiers had to go to the enemy with their terrible problems. And he wanted to prosecute them for ‘war crimes.’

For that reason alone, Mr. Hasan should have been cashiered a long time ago. He should have lost his license to practice, too.

But just wait. It won’t be long before Hasan is celebrated as a man who was acting in (ahem) good faith, and the Army is put on trial for refusing to prosecute his legitimate complaints about the illegal actions of our troops.

We will be told that Hasan had to take drastic action to draw attention to America’s crimes against humanity.

And of course some will believe it.



Bookmark and Share